Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Stephen Colbert Shuts Down Bill O'Reilly's Ludicrous Plan To Fight ISIS

from huffpost






Sunday, September 28, 2014

Schools and banks closed as Hong Kong paralysed by protest

from telegraph.co.uk



Monday morning saw surreal scenes in downtown Hong Kong as protesters continued to occupy main thoroughfares despite a night of tear gas battles with police

Protesters block the main street to the financial Central district outside the government headquarters in Hong Kong
Protesters block the main street to the financial Central district outside the government headquarters in Hong Kong Photo: Carlos Barria/Reuters
Schools were closed, banks were shuttered and bankers and lawyers were forced to take the subway as protesters chanting for democracy continued to occupy the centre of Hong Kong on Monday morning.
Riot police armed with tear gas and teams of officers armed with rifles failed to disperse a crowd of tens of thousands who began streaming into central Hong Kong on Sunday afternoon.
Instead, protesters camped overnight on Hong Kong island and in Kowloon, defying periodic tear gas and baton charges by the police and choosing to ignore rumours that the police would fire rubber bullets.
By the time of the morning rush hour, eight-lane highways were deserted and more than 200 bus routes had to be diverted or suspended. Although the number of protesters began to thin out as some went to work, it is likely that the crowd will swell again during the day.
One shopping centre near the government headquarters, the focus for the protests, flew its Chinese flag upside down in defiance. In Kowloon, protesters sang Cantonese rock anthems and chanted for the police to go on strike.
Hong Kong's school teachers union voted for a strike on Sunday, but those schools that did open on Monday saw student walk-outs.
The continuing chaos sent markets tumbling in Asia's financial capital, with the main Hang Seng index falling 1.73 per cent in its opening hour.
Anson Chan, Hong Kong's former second-in-command, said the scenes in central Hong Kong on Sunday night had disgraced the city. "This is a sad day," she said. "Pictures of our police force firing pepper spray and tear gas into the faces of unarmed protesters will shame our government in front of the whole world."
She said the current administration, by endorsing Beijing's plan to control the 2017 election for Hong Kong's mayor, known locally as the chief executive, had "paved the way for the current crisis".
The protests are the first major test for Xi Jinping, China's president, who came to power last year. On the mainland, censors worked to scrub any news of Hong Kong from reaching the Internet, while newspapers were told not to cover the story.
The Global Times, in its English language edition, continued to suggest that unrest in Hong Kong was being stirred up by foreign forces, saying that Western newspapers had seized on the protests and made comparisons with the Tiananmen Square demonstrations of 1989.
Regina Ip, Hong Kong's former security chief and a Beijing loyalist, told the South China Morning Post that the protest, which began with a student sit-in outside Hong Kong's government offices on Friday, had the potential to evolve into a "mini-Tiananmen".
"On the face of it, the students are voicing their demands for democracy and self-determination," Ms Ip said. "I think the worry on the part of the Hong Kong government is, what if it becomes a mini-Tiananmen? Who is behind it?"
She described the students, many of whom took part in Sunday's protests, as uncivilised. "They remind you of Tiananmen, the protesters asking for dialogue with the chief executive and surrounding the chief executive's office. If the police are driven to disperse them by force, it could turn sour and sinister," she said.
Sunday saw the angriest protests seen since Britain handed Hong Kong back to China in 1997, involving a reported 30,000 people.
The protests follow an angry summer in Hong Kong, with activists accusing the Chinese government of reneging on promises for a free election to choose the region's next mayor, locally known as the chief executive, in 2017.
China has promised universal suffrage – one person, one vote – but intends to control the selection of candidates.
A British parliamentary inquiry is under way, much to Beijing's irritation, into the proposed election plans and Richard Ottaway, the chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee, has said China may have breached the terms of the handover.

Thursday, September 18, 2014

President Obama: ‘Americans Are United’ in Fight Against ISIS

from abc




PHOTO: President Obama addresses the nation on Sept. 18, 2014.
The Senate passed a stop gap funding measure tonight, which includes authorization for President Obama's plan to train and arm Syrian moderates in the fight against ISIS.
The Senate voted 78-22 on the continuing resolution, which will fund the government and authorizes Title X until December 11.
Many Republicans joined Democrats in voting for the continuing resolution, making this a rare bipartisan showing in the Senate.
In a brief statement from the White House President Obama declared a united American front in the fight against ISIS militants.
“The strong bipartisan support in Congress for this new training effort shows the world that Americans are united,” Obama said. “I want to thank members of congress for the speed and seriousness with which they approached this urgent issue -- in keeping with the bipartisanship that is the hallmark of American foreign policy at its best.”
Obama called the program a “key element” of his strategy to combat ISIS, supporting non-American boots on the ground “so that they can help push back these terrorists.”
The president also hailed the growing international coalition of “more than 40 countries, including Arab nations” – singling out France, which announced today that it would join the U.S. in conducting airstrikes in Iraq.
Of the vote, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said: “It’s a long overdue support for the brave Syrians who are fighting on the front lines against the terrorist enemy."
“There is no guarantee of success. ... There is none but there is a guarantee of failure if we do not even try and try we must,” Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., said of arming and training Syrian fighters against ISIS. “Despite my concerns about the underlying bill…I will support this resolution because I think it’s in the best interest of our national security.”
But several of the president’s biggest allies, including one with a tough re-election fight this November, voted against the measure.
Sen. Mark Begich, D-Alaska, whose Republican opponent in the Alaska Senate race said he would support the president’s plan to arm the Syrian rebels, voted against the continuing resolution due to his opposition to training and arming the Syrian rebels.
“I disagree with my president,” Begich said. “The rebels of today may not be the rebels of tomorrow.”
Unlike the House of Representatives, the Senate did not hold a stand-alone vote on the bill, many argued due to concerns of how it would play in the midterm elections this November.
The House had approved authorization to train and arm the Syrian rebels with a vote of 273 to 156 on Wednesday.
The authorization for training and arming the Syrian rebels will run out on December 11th, at which point Congress will have to decide whether it will reauthorize the plan. Sen Dick Durbin, D-Ill., indicated that the Senate will consider a new authorization for the use of military force in November when Congress returns for the lame duck session.
“We are going to take up the construction of a new authorization for the use of military force,” Durbin said. “It’s long overdue. We are living on borrowed time and we’re traveling on vapors. AUMFs passed in 2001 and 2002 are hard to wrap around today’s challenge.”
The continuing resolution now heads to the White House for President Obama’s signature and gives the president the green light to move forward with his plan to train and arm the Syrian rebels.
In his statement Obama reiterated the pledge he made yesterday at CENTCOM: “American forces deployed to Iraq do not and will not have a combat missions. Their purpose is to advise on the ground,” he said.
Meanwhile, the Pentagon is preparing to expand American airstrikes into Syria, which administration officials have said could come any day.
Obama acknowledged tonight that U.S. pilots will be at risk on those missions. “We salute our dedicated pilots and crews,” Obama said, “who are carrying out these missions with great courage and skill.”
He asked Americans to “to keep our forces and their families in their thoughts and prayers.”

Tuesday, September 16, 2014

U.S. General Open to Ground Forces in Fight Against ISIS in Iraq

from nytimes








WASHINGTON — President Obama’s top military adviser said Tuesday that he would recommend deploying United States forces in ground operations against Islamic extremists in Iraq if airstrikes proved insufficient, opening the door to a riskier, more expansive American combat role than the president has publicly outlined.

Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told the Senate Armed Services Committee that while he was confident that an American-led coalition would defeat the Islamic State, he would not foreclose the possibility of asking Mr. Obama to send American troops to fight the militants on the ground — something Mr. Obama has ruled out.


President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey, hand raised, and Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, to his right, in August, leaving the Haci Bayram Veli Mosque in Ankara, the capital, where the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria is known to recruit new members.ISIS Draws a Steady Stream of Recruits From TurkeySEPT. 15, 2014
Prime Minister Tammam Salam of Lebanon, right, arrived in Doha, Qatar, on Sunday for an official visit. Lebanon is among the Arab nations that have pledged to join in the fight against ISIS.Arab Nations Offer to Fight ISIS From AirSEPT. 14, 2014
Nations Trying to Stop Their Citizens From Going to Middle East to Fight for ISISSEPT. 12, 2014
“My view at this point is that this coalition is the appropriate way forward. I believe that will prove true,” General Dempsey said. “But if it fails to be true, and if there are threats to the United States, then I, of course, would go back to the president and make a recommendation that may include the use of U.S. military ground forces.”


With oil revenues, arms and organization, the jihadist group controls vast stretches of Syria and Iraq and aspires to statehood.


General Dempsey acknowledged that this would run counter to the president’s policy, but he said, “He has told me as well to come back to him on a case-by-case basis.”

The general’s statement lays bare the challenge the president will face in selling an expanded military campaign to a war-weary American public. Mr. Obama, seeking to allay fears of another Iraq war, has promised that American ground troops will not be involved in fighting the Islamic State, also known as ISIS or ISIL. In a sign of the administration’s mixed message, the president pointedly did not call it a war, while his advisers later did.

But the realities of a prolonged campaign, General Dempsey said, could make such a hands-off approach untenable, particularly if the battle against the militants moves into densely populated cities where airstrikes are less effective and the chances of civilian casualties are much higher. His candid testimony, hours before a divided House of Representatives began debating whether to approve Mr. Obama’s request for authority to arm the Syrian rebels, drew expressions of concern from antiwar groups and could further complicate the political dynamic for the president.

The White House insisted on Tuesday that Mr. Obama was not shifting his policy and that General Dempsey was not out of sync with his commander in chief.

“It’s the responsibility of the president’s military advisers to plan and consider all the wide range of contingencies,” the White House press secretary, Josh Earnest, said to reporters. “It’s also the responsibility of the commander in chief to set out a clear policy.”

On Wednesday, Mr. Obama is scheduled to get a briefing from his military commanders at the Pentagon’s Central Command headquarters in Tampa, Fla. The rare visit is described by White House officials as part of his effort to mobilize public support for the mission. But it is also calculated to soothe tensions with the military over who is in charge of the operation after Mr. Obama named retired Gen. John R. Allen to be his special envoy to the coalition of countries fighting the Islamic State. General Allen will be based at the State Department.


Already, Mr. Obama’s policy has been tested by his commanders. General Dempsey said Gen. Lloyd J. Austin III, who oversees the Central Command, had recommended putting Special Operations troops on the ground to direct airstrikes during a recent campaign by Iraqi and Kurdish forces to retake the Mosul Dam from the extremist militants.

Mr. Obama rejected that recommendation, and General Dempsey said the United States used technology — a drone known as a Rover — to compensate for not having its own advisers on the ground. The American advisers remained in the Kurdish capital, Erbil.

The challenge will come, General Dempsey said, when Iraqi and Kurdish forces try to drive the militants out of densely populated urban areas like Mosul. In those cases, General Dempsey said, he might recommend deploying Special Operations troops to provide what he called “close combat advising,” essentially working alongside Iraqi commanders in the field and helping them direct their troops to targets.

While the Americans would not fire weapons themselves, military experts said there was little practical distinction between the role General Dempsey described at the hearing and actual combat.

“We’ve already got ground forces introduced, and they are performing combat missions,” Paul D. Eaton, a retired Army general who helped train the Iraqi security forces and is now a senior adviser to the National Security Network, said on Tuesday. “I applaud the general for his candor. That will help the president and the debate greatly.”

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel testified along with General Dempsey, but their appearance appeared to do little to dispel concerns on Capitol Hill. They said the campaign would include the training and equipping of 5,000 Syrian fighters and the involvement of more than 40 coalition nations, including 30 that have pledged military support.

Members of the committee sounded far from convinced that the plan would succeed. Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona, said he doubted that 5,000 Syrian fighters, who could not be trained for months, would be able to fight off more than 30,000 Islamic State combatants. “To many of us that seems like an inadequate response,” he said.


With a vote by the House on authorizing funding for training and arming the Syrian opposition possible on Wednesday afternoon, Republican leaders were carefully gauging support, a sign that the vote could be closer than they would like. Lawmakers on the left and the right threatened to vote against the authorization, for different reasons.

Many Republicans refuse to support a plan they say is too circumscribed and halfhearted. Reluctant Democrats argue it is imprudent to arm a group of rebels who have no clear allegiances to the United States.

“It’s clearly not enough,” said Representative Tom Rooney, a Florida Republican who sits on the Intelligence Committee. “If ISIS is truly a national security threat that needs to be destroyed, then we need to destroy them. And anybody you talk to who knows what they’re talking about believes that arming the rebels is insufficient.”


Mr. Hagel and General Dempsey stressed that this campaign would be nothing like the 2003 invasion of Iraq. “This won’t look like a ‘shock-and-awe campaign’ because that’s not how ISIL is organized,” General Dempsey said.


It is the administration’s eagerness to distinguish the campaign from the Iraq war that has led it into semantic knots. After administration officials first denied it was a war, Mr. Earnest said the United States was at war “in the same way we are at war with Al Qaeda and its affiliates.”

That put Secretary of State John Kerry, who was in the Middle East lining up coalition partners for the campaign, in an awkward position. He had said that Americans should not think of it as a war or slip into “war fever.” Then he was forced to backtrack.

“These terms mean things to the military, and have implications for resource commitments,” said Peter D. Feaver, a former national security aide to George W. Bush and Bill Clinton. “If you’re using the term war, that implies a level of presidential commitment. The acid question is whether it is higher than Obama’s own commitment.”

Helene Cooper contributed reporting from Atlanta, and Eric Schmitt from Monterey, Calif.

A version of this article appears in print on September 17, 2014, on page A1 of the New York edition with the headline: U.S. General Open To Ground Force As Option in Iraq. Order Reprints|Today's Paper|Subscribe

Sunday, September 14, 2014

'Every Day We Wait, They Grow Stronger': McKeon Calls For More Aggressive Action Against ISIS

from foxnews


In the wake of ISIS releasing a new video that shows the horrific beheading of British aid worker David Haines, Rep. Buck McKeon (R-Calif.), chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, joined Maria Bartiromo on Sunday Morning Futures today to discuss President Obama's plan to take on the brutal terror group.


McKeon said this shows the ruthlessness of ISIS and drives home the point that half-measures will not work.
"We have to go after them and go after them hard," he stated, adding that he thinks Obama's plan is a good start, but he should be much more robust in putting boots on the ground.
"We already have boots on the ground. We just have to make sure we have enough to give Iraq the support they need to beat ISIL in Iraq," McKeon said.
"We need to finish them now," he warned. "Every day we wait, they grow stronger."


McKeon noted that our country is making significant military cuts, while, at the same time, asking our military to do more and more.
"We can't keep pushing them to do more without giving them the resources that they need," he said. "So, we've got to make up our minds. If we're going into this, we've got to do it full bore."
​Watch the clip from Sunday Morning Futures above.

Saturday, September 13, 2014

BREAKING-NEWS-ISIS-release-video-claiming-beheading-British-hostage-David-Haines.

from dailymail.co.uk




  • Father-of-two from Perth, Scotland, abducted by militants in Syria last year 
  • He was shown on knees in jihadi video of US journalist being beheaded  
  • In the footage, the extremists also threaten to execute another Briton
  • Militants previously beheaded journalists Steven Sotloff and James Foley


The Islamic State has released a video claiming to show the beheading of British captive David Haines.
The father-of-two, an aid worker, was abducted by militants in Syria last year. 
He appeared at the end of a video showing the beheading of US journalist Steven Sotloff earlier this month.
The Islamic State has released a video claiming to show the beheading of British captive David Haines

The Islamic State has released a video claiming to show the beheading of British captive David Haines
In the video, which has been posted on sites such as YouTube, the extremists also threaten to execute another Briton. 
Islamic State (IS) extremists had threatened to kill Mr Haines and have not responded to any of the family's attempts to make contact so far, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) said.  
Militants from IS have beheaded two American journalists, posting the evidence online in gruesome videos featuring a masked jihadist with a British accent. As well as Mr Sotloff, the other victim was James Foley. 
The 44-year-old has a teenage daughter in Scotland from a previous marriage with wife Louise and a four-year-old daughter in Croatia from his present marriage. 
Mr Haines was taken while working for relief agency ACTED in Syria in March 2013, having previously helped local people in Libya and South Sudan.
He was in Libya during its civil war in 2011, working as head of mission for Handicap International.
It helps disabled people in poverty and conflict zones around the world.   
He had been working for the French aid agency for just ten days when he was taken alongside Federico Motka, an Italian-Swiss aid worker freed four months ago after a ransom was paid. 
Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond has said the FCO will be doing 'everything' they could to protect Mr Haines.
Educated at Perth Academy secondary school, he has worked for aid agencies in some of the world's worst trouble spots, including Libya and South Sudan.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2754934/BBREAKING-NEWS-ISIS-release-video-claiming-beheading-British-hostage-David-Haines.html#ixzz3DEnY4emH
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook


Friday, September 12, 2014

U.S. intensifies sanctions on Russia over Ukraine

from reuters

WASHINGTON Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:13pm EDT



A general view shows the headquarters of Sberbank in Moscow September 12, 2014.  REUTERS/Sergei Karpukhin
A general view shows the headquarters of Sberbank in Moscow September 12, 2014.
CREDIT: REUTERS/SERGEI KARPUKHIN

RELATED TOPICS

(Reuters) - The United States hit Russia's largest bank, a major arms maker and arctic, deepwater and shale exploration by its biggest oil companies with new sanctions on Friday to punish Moscow for its intervention in Ukraine.
The sanctions, coordinated with similar European Union steps, were triggered by what the West sees as Moscow's recent effort to destabilize eastern Ukraine by backing pro-Russian separatists with troops, heavy arms and cross-border shelling.. They are the latest economic penalties imposed by the West since Russiaannexed Crimea from Ukraine in March.
The sanctions target companies including Sberbank, Russia's largest bank by assets, and Rostec, a conglomerate that makes everything from Kalashnikovs to cars, by limiting their ability to access the U.S. debt markets.
They also bar U.S. companies from selling goods or services to five Russian energy companies to conduct deepwater, Arcticoffshore and shale projects. The Russian firms affected are Gazprom, Gazprom Neft, Lukoil, Surgutneftegas and Rosneft.
The United States stressed that the sanctions could be removed ifRussia, which denies sending troops into eastern Ukraine and arming the separatists, took a series of steps including the withdrawal of all of its forces from its neighbor.
However, a defiant Russian President Vladimir Putin called the new economic penalties "strange," given his backing of peace efforts in eastern Ukraine, and Russia's Foreign Ministry said it would respond quickly with retaliatory measures against what it criticized as another "hostile step."
SHUTTING DOWN SOME OIL EXPLORATION
The energy sanctions, and similar EU steps, are not designed to curb Russia's current, conventional oil production but to hit future production by depriving Russian firms of the expertise of companies such as Exxon Mobil Corp and BP Plc.
Russia, along with Saudi Arabia and the United States, is one of the world's top oil producers and is the main energy supplier to Europe. Like other producers, it is keen to extract oil from the arctic, shale fields and deep sea deposits.
The latest U.S. energy sanctions go further than steps Washington took in July, when the U.S. Commerce Department barred American companies from using certain technologies to exploit oil in shale, deep sea and arctic fields.
"It is designed to effectively shut down this type of oil exploration and production activity by depriving these Russian companies of the goods, technology and services that they need to do this work," a senior U.S. official who spoke to reporters on condition of anonymity said of the U.S. and EU steps.
Texas-based Exxon signed a $3.2 billion agreement in 2011 with Russian company Rosneft Oil Co to develop the Arctic, while BP owns 18.5 percent of Rosneft, the Russian state-controlled oil giant, according to Thomson Reuters data.
Earlier this year BP signed a deal to explore for oil with Rosneft in Russia's Volga-Urals region primarily focusing on unconventional, or shale formations, in that region.
Major oil companies, including Exxon, said they were assessing the sanctions and would comply with U.S. law.
The new U.S. sanctions were timed to coincide with fresh European Union economic penalties that included restrictions on financing for some Russian state-owned companies and asset freezes on leading Russian politicians.
The U.S. Treasury Department said the sanctions include a ban on U.S. individuals or companies dealing with Rostec, a major Russian technology and defense conglomerate, in debt transactions of more than 30 days maturity.
Assets also were blocked for five state-owned defense technology firms, OAO Dolgoprudny Research Production Enterprise, Mytishchinski Mashinostroitelny Zavod OAO, Kalinin Machine Plant JSC, Almaz-Antey GSKB, and JSC NIIP.
The new sanctions also tighten the financial noose on six Russian banks, including Sberbank, by barring U.S. individuals and companies from dealing in any debt they issue of longer than 30 days maturity.
The five banks previously covered had only faced a restriction on debt maturities of more than 90 days. Like those five, Sberbank now also faces a ban on U.S. equity financing.
The Treasury Department also imposed sanctions prohibiting U.S. individuals and companies from dealing in new debt of greater than 90 days maturity issued by Russian energy companies Gazprom Neft and Transneft.
"These steps underscore the continued resolve of the international community against Russia’s aggression," U.S. Treasury Secretary Jack Lew said in a statement. "Russia’s economic and diplomatic isolation will continue to grow as long as its actions do not live up to its words."

(Additonal reporting by Roberta Rampton, Lesley Wroughton, Timothy Gardner in Washington; Ernest Scheyder in North Dakota, Terry Wade in Houston and Alessandra Prentice in Moscow; Editing by Tim Ahmann and Tom Brown)