Wednesday, December 9, 2015

Why Hillary Would be a Worse President than Would a Republican

from disidentvoice.org





Hello, is anybody in there?
Just nod if you can hear me
Is there anyone home?
— Roger Waters and David Jon Gilmour, “Comfortably Numb,” from Pink Floyd’s 1979 album The Wall
Hillary Clinton will be a worse president than would a Republican.  For years corporate media have pounded the line that her election is inevitable, and that has millions of voters convinced.  Unfortunately, many of them also believe in the “lesser evil” straw man which is also pushed by corporate media– if you don’t vote for your party’s candidate (Democrat or Republican) even though you don’t like that candidate, a more evil candidate of the other party will win, which herds the masses into continually shooting themselves in the foot.
This makes it impossible for change, since the Democrats and Republicans are funded by the same criminals, banksters, polluters and defense cheats, and have basically the same desire to serve their masters over the public interest.
Hillary will be able to do things no Republican can do.  Like her Republican friends (the Clintons seem to have a lot of them, John McCain, George HW Bush) Hillary will be able to get Republican votes for the agenda of the plutocrats who run USA, Inc., but unlike the Republicans, she will be able to get Democratic Party votes, because conservative Democratic legislators will be able to say they are only supporting their Democratic president as they break ranks.
History tells us this is so.
In Hillary’s husband’s first term, he had no trouble passing NAFTA, Ronald Reagan’s unfulfilled dream.  Although the Democrats controlled both houses of Congress, two-thirds of the Democrats opposed NAFTA because it would hurt the environment and American workers would lose jobs.
Bill Clinton sent his sidekick Al Gore, who had recently been a Senator, to twist Democratic arms in the Senate, where Republicans were already sold on Clinton’s plan.  In the House, Clinton relied on Newt Gingrich, then minority leader, to make sure Republicans were brought into line so there would be few defectors.  Conservative Democrats used the excuse they were only supporting their Democratic president.
NAFTA passed by a comfortable margin, and a Republican would have had no possibility of getting it done with both Houses of Congress controlled by Democrats.
Next Democrat, Obama.
When George W. Bush was leaving the White House in January of 2009, his polling numbers were south of whale poop.  The public were fed up with his wars based on lies and his bankster bailout.  No Republican winning the 2008 election could have extended these catastrophes for the average American, without riots in the streets.
What were the ruling oligarchs and plutocrats to do?  Spending profusely on his campaign, they brought in Barack Obama to fix things.  Obama quickly increased the troop strength in Afghanistan by 30,000, and completed the bankster bailout, burying Wall Street in tax dollars.
Although there was grumbling by some Congressional Democrats, what did Obama care?  He had massive Republican support for these.  The ruling establishment loves sellout Democrats, because they can do so much more than Republicans to please their masters.  Obama received more funding from banksters in his 2008 election than any candidate for office in history.  They knew they could count on him, even with both Houses of Congress controlled by Democrats.
Like Clinton, who also began his presidency with both houses of the Congress, Obama also lost the Congress to Republican control, because rank and file Democrats realized they’d been betrayed and sat on their hands.
Having a Republican controlled Congress helps modern Democrat presidents, though, because they then have an excuse that they can do nothing because Republicans won’t let them.  One recalls both Clinton and Obama whining that Republicans simply tied their hands from doing anything at all progressive.  This did not stop them from pushing military spending and free trade agreements like the worst fears about what a Republican might do.
Republicans do not really try to stop Democratic Presidents when they attempt to serve the oligarchs and plutocrats who fund our elections.  Republicans didn’t even raise a peep when Obama unconstitutionally attacked Libya without consulting Congress.  They love war.  At least President GW Bush asked Congress for support when he violated international law by invading Iraq (Hillary eagerly backed him with her Senate vote).
Since the 1970s, Democrats have moved from being liberal to being conservative (now called liberal in corporate newspeak).  Republicans have moved from being conservative to being fascist (using FDR’s definition, now called conservative in corporate newspeak).  Under Democrats and Republicans, wages for the working class have declined since 1973 as wealth has funneled upward to the plutocrats and oligarchs who fund our elections.
Our ruling establishment has learned that conservative Democrats sell out far better than mainstream Republicans, and have begun to fund them well for that reason.  Hillary should have far more money from the scum of the earth than any of her Republican opponents with her bona fides, including her stint in the leadership of the Democratic Leadership Council, formed to make a second Republican Party of the Democrats.
No Republican can undermine Social Security, many have tried, but the opposition gets fierce.  Even conservative Democrats won’t help a Republican president with this.  It will take a Democrat like Hillary to do it.  She will use the pretense that she is “saving Social Security.”
While it’s true Republicans are nastier and would do nastier things if they could, they largely fail at major free trade deals, deregulation, privatization and the like, it takes a Democrat to get the job done.  When Republicans try these things, the Democratic Party base rises up in protest and the Democrats vote it down if they have majorities in Congress, or filibuster it if they don’t, and it goes nowhere.
But when a Bill Clinton or Barack Obama is in, they get Republican support and combine it with conservative Democrats to win on issues that sell out the American public.  The Democratic rank and file go to sleep, and only awaken for protest when the next Republican takes the White House.
Many of those who realize that lesser evil voting only slides the people backward, have decided to begin to build a way out, and are looking at candidates like Jill Stein of the Green Party.  Realizing that she represents the public interest, corporate media have completely blacked out her candidacy, instead covering those who will serve their masters, so there’s hard work ahead.
Jack Balkwill is an activist in Virginia. He can be reached atlibertyuv@hotmail.com Read other articles by Jack.

Wednesday, November 25, 2015

Tensions rise as Russia says it's deploying anti-aircraft missiles to Syria

from cnn


Story highlights

  •  Turkey releases tape: "You are approaching Turkish airspace. Change your heading south immediately"
  • Rescued Russian co-pilot says "there were no warnings" before his plane was shot down
  • Russia's foreign minister says the plane's downing "looks very much like a planned provocation"
Istanbul (CNN)Tensions in the Middle East ratcheted up dangerously Wednesday, a day after Turkey shot down a Russian warplane, with the Turkish President accusing Russia of deceit and Russia announcing it would deploy anti-aircraft missiles to Syria.
Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoygu said on his ministry's Twitter feed that the country would deploy S-400 defense missile systems to its Hmeymim air base near Latakia, on Syria's Mediterranean coast.
    The missiles have a range of 250 kilometers (155 miles), according to the missilethreat.com website. The Turkish border is less than 30 miles away.
    And Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov told Russian TV on Wednesday that Russia has "serious doubts" that Turkey's downing of its warplane Tuesday was "an unpremeditated act."
    "It looks very much like a planned provocation," Lavrov said.
    Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan condemned what he said was the violation of Turkish airspace by Russian warplanes, calling the incident an infringement of his country's sovereignty.
    He charged Russia with propping up the Syrian regime of Bashar al-Assad -- a regime he said was inflicting terrorism on its own people. His remarks came a day after Russian President Vladimir Putin accused Turkey of being "the terrorists' accomplices" for shooting down a plane he claimed was on an anti-terrorism mission.
    Erdogan disputed that claim in a speech Wednesday.
    "There is no Daesh" in the area where the Russian planes were flying, Erdogan said, using another name for ISIS. "Do not deceive us! We know the locations of Daesh."

    An alarming wave of international turbulence

    And experts agreed.
    "None of the targets that ... the Russians were going after had anything to do with ISIS. Those were all those Turkmen groups," said CNN military analyst Cedric Leighton, a retired U.S. Air Force colonel.
    The Turkmen minority in that part of northern Syria has strong ties to the Turkish government, which wants to afford them a degree of protection. Anyone who bombs that area attacks "our brothers and sisters -- Turkmen," Erdogan said.
    Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said his country doesn't want to "drive a wedge" into its relationship with Russia, according to the semiofficial Anadolu news agency. And the foreign ministers of these two nations have already spoken by phone and plan to meet in person over the coming days, the news agency also reported, citing Turkish Foreign Ministry spokesman Tanju Bilgic.
    Still, even as Erdogan has insisted Turkey doesn't want to escalate the situation, the anger in his words -- and those of Putin -- showed that the conflict in Syria has now churned up a new and alarming wave of international turbulence.
    The stakes are high in Syria, where the United States, Russia and a swarm of other global, regional and local forces are entangled in the civil war.

    Turkey releases tape

    Turkey, a NATO member, said it had repeatedly warned the Russian warplane, shooting it down only after it ignored several warnings and violated Turkish airspace.
    Russia rejected that version of events, with the rescued co-pilot Capt. Konstantin Murakhtin telling state media reporters that "there were no warnings -- not via the radio, not visually."
    "If they wanted to warn us, they could have shown themselves by heading on a parallel course," Murakhtin said, according to the official Sputnik news agency. "But there was nothing."
    Russia: Pilot dead, marine killed in rescue attempt
    Russia: Pilot dead, marine killed in rescue attempt 03:45
    Russian officials have also asserted that the Sukhoi Su-24 bomber was attacked 1 kilometer inside Syrian territory.
    But Erdogan said parts of the downed plane had fallen inside Turkey, injuring two people.
    On Wednesday, Turkey's military released an audio recording of what it says was its warning to the Russian warplane.
    In one portion, a voice is heard saying: "This is Turkish Air Force speaking on guard. You are approaching Turkish airspace. Change your heading south immediately. Change your heading south."
    Russia has not yet commented on the audio.

    The plane's crew

    Adding to the tensions were questions about the fates of the two Russian pilots aboard the bomber.
    Turkmen rebels operating in the area of Syria where the plane went down appeared to claim in a video that they shot both pilots to death as they parachuted toward the ground.
    The Russian military said it believed one of the pilots was dead. The Russian Defense Ministry said Wednesday that the second pilot had been rescued and was safe.
    The military also said a Russian marine was killed when a helicopter came under attack during the search and rescue efforts.

    Russia's first acknowledged casualties in Syria

    Russia announced awards for the service members involved in the incident.
    The pilot who died, Lt. Col. Oleg Peshkov, was posthumously given the title Hero of the Russian Federation "for heroism, courage and valor in the performance of military duty," the Kremlin said Wednesday on its website.
    The marine who was killed during the rescue effort, Alexander Pozynich, was posthumously awarded the Order of Courage "for heroism, courage and valor in the performance of military duty," and Murakhtin, the jet crew member who Russia said was rescued, also was awarded the Order of Courage, the Kremlin said.
    The deaths are Russia's first acknowledged casualties since it waded into the bitter Syrian conflict less than two months ago.
    Why is Russia in Syria?
    Why is Russia in Syria?01:58
    They highlight the risks in Putin's decision to support Assad, coming less than a month after another player in the war, the terrorist group ISIS, claimed responsibility for the deadly bombing of a Russian passenger jet over Egypt.

    'The importance of de-escalating the situation'

    Fmr. NATO Cmdr.: Turkey has funneled fighters to ISIS
    Fmr. NATO Cmdr.: Turkey has funneled fighters to ISIS 03:13
    U.S. President Barack Obama spoke to Erdogan by phone Tuesday and "expressed U.S. and NATO support for Turkey's right to defend its sovereignty," the White House said.
    "The leaders agreed on the importance of de-escalating the situation and pursuing arrangements to ensure that such incidents do not happen again," it said.
    But removing all risk of clashes in the crowded Syrian battlefield appears tricky, with regional foes like Iran and Saudi Arabia involved. Syria's civil war has killed hundreds of thousands of people and forced millions to flee their homes and their country.

    Expert: Putin is 'a bully' but also 'rational'

    U.S. is 'only realistic leader' in Syria ISIS fight
    U.S. is 'only realistic leader' in Syria ISIS fight 01:40
    Lt. Gen. Sergei Rudskoy, a senior official in the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, said military-level contacts with Turkey would be terminated -- hardly a move likely to help avoid future skirmishes.
    Putin could also seek to hurt Turkey economically, analysts said.
    "Turkey receives about 60% of its natural gas supplies from Russia," said Nicholas Burns, a former U.S. ambassador to NATO. "So there are things the Russians could do to make their displeasure felt."
    In the near term, the clash appears likely to have derailed French President Francois Hollande's hopes of forming a broader coalition against ISIS -- including the United States, Russia and others -- in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks on Paris. Hollande is scheduled to visit Putin in Moscow on Thursday.