Sunday, June 22, 2014

In Iraq, militants press on toward Baghdad

from cnn


By Chelsea J. Carter, Mohammed Tawfeeq and Hamdi Alkhshali, CNN
updated 7:21 PM EDT, Sun June 22, 2014




Baghdad, Iraq (CNN) -- Militant fighters tightened their grip Sunday on western Iraq as security forces withdrew from a handful of towns in Anbar province, moving closer to Baghdad.
The news that Iraqi forces withdrew from at least three towns in the province raised questions about whether Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's government is giving up on the region.
It also comes the same day that Iran's religious leader condemned any U.S. involvement in Iraq, saying al-Maliki's government can handle its own problems.
"The United States is trying to portray this as a sectarian war. But what is happening in Iraq is not a war between Shiite and Sunnis," Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said in a statement carried by the state-run IRNA news agency.
Iraqi Shias show force in weapons parade
Iraq: Six things you need to know
Secret video of ISIS smuggled out of Iraq
Iraqi Christians living in fear of ISIS
He blamed the attacks in Iraq on the remnants of Saddam Hussein's regime and extremists.
But U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, speaking from Cairo, said no one should mistake what is happening and why.
"This is about (ISIS) designs on the state of Iraq," he said. "... The United States is prepared to help Iraq stand up against that."
As part of that effort, Kerry called on al-Maliki's Shiite-dominated government to rise above "sectarian motivations" to become more inclusive, more representative of its population.
Closer and closer to Baghdad
As international pressure mounts on al-Maliki, ISIS fighters continued their advance from the west and north on Baghdad.
Iraqi security officials told CNN that Tal Afar airbase in northern Iraq was taken by militants believed to be ISIS on Sunday afternoon.
Militants took over the town of Tal Afar last week but by Sunday, they also controlled the air base completely, officials said. Thousands of Shiite Turkmen families fled the town last week when ISIS attacked the town.
The western Anbar town of Rutba, 113 kilometers (about 70 miles) from the borders of Jordan and Saudi Arabia, was in the hands ISIS fighters, two security sources in Baghdad and one in Anbar told CNN on Sunday.
With the capture Saturday of Qaim on the border with Syria, where ISIS enjoys a stronghold, and a number of other towns in Anbar province, the fighters now have a direct line to the western outskirts of Baghdad.
At least 70% of the province is under the control of ISIS, two security officials in the region told CNN.
Iraqi forces withdrew from Haditha, about 270 kilometers (about 168 miles) northwest of Baghdad, during the overnight hours, two security officials in Anbar, speaking on condition of anonymity, told CNN.
Sunni tribes considered friendly to the Iraqi army took over security for the town, but officials believe it will fall to ISIS, said the officials, who are not authorized to speak to the media.
Haditha is home to the largest hydroelectric plant in Anbar, which is vital to the water supply of the province.
Iraq's military spokesman, Maj. Gen. Qassim Atta, told reporters there was a "strategic withdrawal" in some areas but did not detail the specific locations.
He said the withdrawals were part of a campaign to "open all these fronts so we can strengthen our positions."
Photos: Iraq under siegePhotos: Iraq under siege
Mass exodus tears Iraqi families apart
What will U.S. 'advisers' do in Iraq?
Militants capture chemical weapons plant
Even so, there is a question of whether Iraqi forces can retake the regions under the control of well-armed ISIS fighters.
The fighters launched an attack during the overnight hours against one of the two remaining military bases in Anbar, two security officials in the province told CNN.
The fighters attacked Khalidiya military base, near Ramadi, but were unable to take it and withdrew early Sunday, the officials said.
Al-Asad, a large Iraqi air force base, and the nearby town of Hit are still under the control of the central government. The expectation, the officials say, is that both will be attacked next.
Despite the government effort to protect the Iraqi capital, minor clashes were reported between Sunni insurgents, possibly ISIS fighters, and Iraqi security forces in the Sunni town of Abu Ghraib very near Baghdad's western border, according to security officials.
Violence elsewhere in Iraq
Sporadic violence was reported across Iraq, including in the Shiite-dominated city of Hillah, about 95 kilometers (60 miles) south of Baghdad, where a recruiting station was shelled.
At least four people were killed and 34 were wounded in the attack on the recruiting station, where hundreds of predominantly Shiite men were answer a call to arms to protect Iraq.
In the northern city of Mosul, site of one of the first major victories for ISIS militants, witnesses told CNN on Sunday that the group used vehicle-mounted loudspeakers that it had decided to form Islamic Sharia courts in the city.
The group also reportedly removed statues of the Christian Virgin Mary, Arab poet Abu Tammam and singer Mulla Othman, witnesses said.
The Iraqi government was waiting for the initial group of U.S. military advisers to arrive in Iraq soon, a senior defense official said.
This first detail is expected to be very small, the official said. The total number of U.S. military advisers who will eventually deploy will be about 300.
In addition, some U.S. military personnel already at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad will be reassigned and become advisers, Pentagon spokesman Rear Adm. John Kirby said.

CNN's Nic Robertson and Nima Elbagir contributed from Baghdad, and Arwa Damon from Irbil, Iraq. Mohammed Tawfeeq contributed from Atlanta. Michael Martinez wrote from Los Angeles.


Wednesday, June 18, 2014

Extremists Attack Iraq’s Biggest Oil Refinery

from nytimes




BAGHDAD — Refinery workers, witnesses and an Iraqi Army officer reported the seizure of Iraq’s biggest oil refinery by Sunni extremists on Wednesday after army helicopter gunships failed to repel their attack. But other Iraqi officials, including the commander of the garrison defending the refinery in Baiji, asserted that fighting was still going on inside the extensive facility, shut down by the violence.
The battle in Baiji, 130 miles north of Baghdad, came as the Obama administration, which extricated American troops from Iraq less than three years ago, was weighing a more muscular response, including airstrikes, to help the besieged government of Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki.
Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari said Wednesday in Saudi Arabia that Iraq had asked for American airstrikes, according to Al Arabiya television. That would make Mr. Zebari the first top Iraqi official to publicly confirm that request, reported by The New York Times last week. Also on Wednesday, Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. spoke by telephone with Mr. Maliki and vowed solidarity with the Iraqi people against the Sunni militants, White House officials said. The White House added that Mr. Biden emphasized the need for Mr. Maliki to govern “in an inclusive manner.” If the insurgent takeover of Baiji is confirmed, the facility would be the first operating refinery to fall to the fighters of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, or ISIS, who have swept through much of northern Iraq. They have surrounded the refinery in Baiji for the past week, fighting a battalion of the Iraqi Army that had been backed by air support.
Continue reading the main story
Encroaching on Baghdad
PUBLISHED JUNE 18
Since seizing Mosul on June 10, the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria has been attacking towns along the main highway heading south, coming closer and closer to the capital.Related Maps and Multimedia »
Sources: Institute for the Study of War; Long War Journal
KEY  Towns attacked  Bomb attacks
MILES FROM
CENTRAL BAGHDAD
70
Adhaim
Samarra
60
Al-Mutasim
Dhuluiya
Muqdadiya
Ishaqi
40
Dujail
30
Baquba
Tarmiyah
20
10
Falluja
Baghdad
The loss of the refinery could deny the Iraq government an important source of fuel and provide the insurgents with a potentially lucrative source of income, assuming that they can ensure its continued operation and sell the fuel, at least in the areas they control. ISIS already profits from its control of oil resources in eastern Syria.
In a televised statement, an Iraqi military spokesman, Gen. Qassim Atta, denied that the Baiji refinery had fallen.
“Baiji is now under control of our security forces, completely,” said General Atta, appearing on Iraqiya, the state television channel, hours after ISIS fighters had apparently taken over the refinery.
A local government official in Baiji, and the army commander in charge of defending the refinery, also insisted that the Iraqi authorities were still in control, although they conceded that the fighters had invaded the facility and controlled two of the four main entrances.
“We are fine, we are still inside the refinery and we are fighting,” said Brig. Gen. Arras Abdul Qadir, the commander of the troops guarding the refinery, reached by telephone Wednesday afternoon. Asked how long his troops could hold out, he said, “We will see.”
Other accounts from Baiji said the insurgents had total control. A refinery worker reached by telephone who gave only his first name, Mohammad, said that the refinery had been attacked at 4 a.m. and that workers had taken refuge in underground bunkers. An unknown number of natural gas storage tanks were set ablaze. After taking heavy losses, the troops guarding the facility surrendered, at least 70 were taken prisoner and the refinery workers were sent home unharmed, he said.
An Iraqi Army lieutenant from Baiji, also reached by telephone and speaking on the condition of anonymity, said he had fled his unit when it became clear they could not resist the ISIS forces.
Witnesses in the area also reported seeing ISIS checkpoints controlling access to the sprawling refinery area, and smoke rising over the complex from numerous fires.
The attackers had besieged the refinery for the past week, after most of the surrounding Salahuddin Province had fallen under their control.
Foreign workers, including 50 from the German company Siemens, had been evacuated from the refinery, according to news reports quoting Siemens officials. Olive Group, a security company, said it had evacuated its six clients from the refinery in recent days “in a routine road move.”
“We took the decision to extract them, having monitored the situation around the refinery closely in the last two weeks and determining that it was deteriorating,” said Martin Rudd, Olive Group’s managing director.
Photo
The oil refinery in Baiji, in 2009. It could give militants a major source of revenue.CreditThaier Al-Sudani/Reuters
The complex is about halfway between Baghdad and Mosul, Iraq’s second-largest city, which the insurgents invaded last week. The complex includes the refinery as well as a 600-megawatt power plant, which supplies electricity to much of northern Iraq. The power plant had fallen to ISIS fighters earlier.
The refinery has the capacity to process 310,000 barrels of oil a day produced in northern Iraq, and provides refined products to 11 Iraqi provinces, including Baghdad, chiefly for domestic consumption.
The attackers had besieged the refinery for the past week, after most of the surrounding Salahuddin Province had fallen under their control.
Foreign workers, including 50 from the German company Siemens, had been evacuated from the refinery, according to news reports quoting Siemens officials. Olive Group, a security company, said it had evacuated its six clients from the refinery in recent days “in a routine road move.”
“We took the decision to extract them, having monitored the situation around the refinery closely in the last two weeks and determining that it was deteriorating,” said Martin Rudd, Olive Group’s managing director.
Photo
The oil refinery in Baiji, in 2009. It could give militants a major source of revenue.CreditThaier Al-Sudani/Reuters
The complex is about halfway between Baghdad and Mosul, Iraq’s second-largest city, which the insurgents invaded last week. The complex includes the refinery as well as a 600-megawatt power plant, which supplies electricity to much of northern Iraq. The power plant had fallen to ISIS fighters earlier.
The refinery has the capacity to process 310,000 barrels of oil a day produced in northern Iraq, and provides refined products to 11 Iraqi provinces, including Baghdad, chiefly for domestic consumption.
General Atta, in his televised statement, said Iraqi forces were continuing to fight in Baiji, and he praised the efforts of one air force pilot in particular in staving off the insurgents. “The air force is in the battle against them, with the support from the Golden Division of the special forces,” he said, referring to an elite unit that is reportedly under the prime minister’s direct control. “We will continue our operations and we will not let anyone from ISIS take one foot of our lands.”
Asked whether the refinery had fallen to ISIS, Asim Jehad, the spokesman for the oil ministry, declined to comment, saying that only General Atta was authorized to discuss security matters. An oil industry official, speaking on the condition of anonymity because of Iraqi government sensitivity on the issue, said the refinery had fallen to the insurgents.
General Atta also said Iraqi forces were making gains in several areas in Salahuddin and Nineveh, and had retaken the city of Tal Afar, which was reported to have fallen to the militants on Monday.
He depicted a military situation that contradicted most reports from the field so far, saying Iraqi forces had regained the initiative. “Now our forces are becoming stronger,” he said. “Now we are the ones who are taking the initiative and making the attacks, instead of defending.”
So far, the fighting has largely been isolated to cities in the north, including Mosul and Tikrit, where ISIS fighters have taken control, sending thousands of civilians fleeing to the relative safety of Iraq’s autonomous Kurdistan region. Relief workers from the United Nations refugee agency expressed concern Wednesday that temporary camps were already overcrowded, with more families arriving every day.
Iraq’s main oil fields and export facilities are clustered around Basra in the south. International oil traders are worried that the unrest could spread, threatening supplies destined for export. Iraq is the second-largest oil producer in OPEC, representing the largest source of growth among the 12 member countries.
In a separate development, Indian officials expressed concern about the fate of 40 Indian workers who disappeared after ISIS forces overran Mosul, and about 46 Indian nurses working at a hospital in Tikrit that is under the group’s control. Indian newspapers on Wednesday quoted officials who said they were worried about their citizens caught in the fighting.

“Indian workers in Mosul disappeared, probably kidnapped by ISIS,” said Yassin al-Ma’amouri, the head of the Iraqi Red Crescent Society. “Nobody knows anything about them.”
But Mr. Ma’amouri said Red Crescent workers had visited the Indian nurses at the hospital in Tikrit and found them in good condition. “Nine of them are afraid to stay here, the rest are fine,” he said. “We visited them, gave them phone cards to call their families, gave them food, pocket money.”
“They are working in the hospital now and feel fine, but on the other hand we don’t know the reaction of those gunmen of ISIS,” he said, adding that evacuating the nurses by road would be too dangerous.
Correction: June 18, 2014 
An earlier version of this article misspelled the given name of the Iraq head of mission for Doctors Without Borders. He is Fabio Forgione, not Favio.

Tuesday, June 17, 2014

ISIS Born from Occupation of Iraq, not Syrian Civil War

from therealnews.com 


June 17, 2014


Vijay Prashad: Although it's not clear where the Saudis stand in relation to ISIS, the group itself is a product of the Iraq War, and Western diplomats were in deep denial about its power prior to its major military offensive that began last week -   June 17, 14







Wednesday, June 11, 2014

All 74 School Shootings Since Newtown, In One Depressing Map

from huffpost

Posted: Updated: 


After the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, in December 2012, President Obama promised "meaningful action to prevent more tragedies like this." His gun reform push, focused on a background check measure that had overwhelming public support, failed in the Senate last year, and Congress hasn't passed any other gun legislation.
At least 74 school shootings happened during those 18 months, according to a tally by Everytown for Gun Safety, a group fighting to pass gun control laws. That's more than one each week school was in session, with the longest gap between shootings spanning last summer's break, from mid-June to mid-August.
The most recent shooting happened Tuesday morning at a high school east of Portland, Oregon. The gunman and a student are reported dead.
Clarification: Everytown used the following methodology: Incidents were classified as school shootings when a firearm was discharged inside a school building or on school or campus grounds, as documented in publicly reported news accounts. This includes assaults, homicides, suicides, and accidental shootings. Incidents in which guns were brought into schools but not fired there, or were fired off school grounds after having been possessed in schools, were not included. This list includes incidents meeting the above criteria that were brought to our attention after our School Shootings Analysis was issued on February 10, 2014. Incidents were identified through media reports, so this is likely an undercount of the true total.



Sunday, June 1, 2014

What’s In A Name? Global Warming Vs. Climate Change In The Eyes Of Americans

from mintpressnews.com


Could the expression “climate change” be the culprit for the lack of action taken on the issue?
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
    • Google+
    climatechangeIn a surprising report released today by the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, researchers looked at the impact of the two most common terms for human-induced climate warming—global warming and climate change—on Americans.
    The authors found that the term “global warming” is associated with greater public understanding, emotional engagement and support for personal and national action than the term “climate change,” which is often favored by scientists.
    Among other findings, the report—What’s In A Name? Global Warming vs. Climate Changeshowed the term “global warming” appears to be associated with:
    • Greater certainty that the phenomenon is happening, especially among men, Generation X (31-48) and liberals.
    • Greater understanding that human activities are the primary cause among Independents.
    • Greater understanding that there is a scientific consensus about the reality of the phenomenon among Independents and liberals.
    • More intense worry about the issue, especially among men, Generation Y (18-30), Generation X, Democrats, liberals and moderates.
    • A greater sense of personal threat, especially among women, the Greatest Generation (68+), African-Americans, Hispanics, Democrats, Independents, Republicans, liberals and moderates.
    • Higher issue priority ratings for action by the president and Congress, especially among women, Democrats, liberals and moderates.
    • Greater willingness to join a campaign to convince elected officials to take action, especially among men, Generation X, liberals and moderates.
    While for some in-the-know, the two phrases are often seen as synonymous, the report—which analyzed three separate studies—clearly shows that they mean different things to different Americans. The general public tends to favor the term “global warming”—and perhaps we should take note.
    Screen Shot 2014-05-27 at 2.10.17 PM
    The need for climate mitigation seems to be growing more urgent by the day. Just this month, the Obama Administration released the National Climate Report which concluded that global warming is increasing the frequency of extreme weather events, Center for Naval Analyses released its National Security and the Accelerating Risks of Climate Change report saying that climate change is a “catalyst for conflict” and University of California, Irvine conclusively stated that the West Antarctic glacier has melted past the point of no return and will inevitably raise sea levels by up to four feet. 
    Yet, the climate deniers still wield alarming influence. Big contenders with even bigger pocket books, like the Koch Brothers, are able to pump money into anti-climate campaigns, bills and agendas, drowning out the voices of scientists who continue to prove that climate change—or, global warming, rather—is real, caused in part by humans and happening right now.
    Could the expression “climate change” be the culprit for the lack of action taken on the issue? Cognitive meaning can and does change, so perhaps with the continued use of “climate change,” it will come to acquire a similar meaning as “global warming” in the minds of Americans. But language choices can influence public policy. The terms we use to describe our world shape the way in which we see it. And, as with most things, the key to mobilizing the public is to appeal to emotions on a personal level, which as this study has shown, might be better conjured by a simple change of phrase.

    Read the full report below:
    This article was written by Laura Bean for EcoWatch